Collaboratory in Critical Security Methods
The International Collaboratory on Critical Methods in Security Studies is an ESRC funded project (RES-810-21-0072)
This cluster focuses on the relationship between mapping - the process of representing spatially non-spatial and spatial positions and relations - and critical security studies. We consider mapping to be both a method and an object of inquiry. That is, it can be a means for understanding how actors, ideas and objects relate to one another, be it in networks, fields, controversies or other to-be-named social or geographical spaces; a means of mapping (in)security. But it can also be, simultaneously, a process to be studied. Maps are a form of articulated relations - through diagrams, charts, statistics, or even through the deployment of metaphors. Our cluster, taking this into consideration, believes that the social uses of mapping are to be interrogated as much as the actors, ideas, objects that are represented.
Spatial and geometric metaphors - network, field, cartography, diagram, topos, rhizome etc - often linked to specific methodologies involving spatial representations, are increasingly present within social theory and its application in critical security studies. Yet mapping, to a certain extent, is a process of controlling, fixing, bordering and disciplining by transforming qualitative differences into quantitative data; so how can it be used in a critical way? Can one map social realities, be they geographical or not, while simultaneously accounting for complexity, contingency, transformations, movement and reflexivity? Or is mapping essentially linked to an ontology of determinism, fixity and what James C. Scott has called state simplifications that do not just fulfill a didactic purpose but also enable a tighter form of governance? While the role of mapping typically is to make things evident in the ethymological sense of the term (what can be seen and hence what can be shown visually), is not the essence of criticality to question the self-evident? Can the activity of mapping be properly described as a method of visualizing the results of one's research or even of doing research? And how can the conventional place of mapping in security studies be circumvented or even countered by the method of mapping itself?
In considering critical potential of mapping, both analytical and political questions arise. Analytically, post-positivist methods and analyses promote a consideration of how mapping relates to both the representation and production of a given reality, how mapping relates to cognition, and how mapping may work toward (de)naturalization and (de)construction of social reality. Politically, if mapping has traditionally been about fixing, we can also envisage social processes of counter-fixing or counter-mapping. Mapping is thus not in and of itself a critical practice or tool, but if the productivity of mapping is its ability to make action possible by ordering social realities, then critical security studies might well attempt counter-mapping operations.
For example, how would a critical mapping differ from the mapping of Iraqi culture carried out by the US Army's Human Terrain System (HTS)? What is political about inverting the globe and representing the South as the North? What does it mean to criticize a practice while sharing the same method and hence engaging in a form of mimetic rivalry, following René Girard's expression? Why are some spaces more frequently or intensively mapped than others? And even when used critically, does mapping not still require processes of abstraction, reduction and of transmutation of the qualitative into quantity? Are there gendered and postcolonial critiques to be made of even critical uses of mapping? And what about resistance to the practice of mapping, such as pulling down street signs in an effort to subvert the use of maps? What purchase do mapping metaphors provide? And what critical function does mapping produce and make possible? These and other questions animate the work of this cluster.
Christopher Alderson, christopher.alderson@gmail.com